❓Why does the third term in the expression (the contraction between the time derivative of the inerti
Why does the third term in the expression (the contraction between the time derivative of the inertia tensor and the angular velocity) vanish?
The third term in the expression for (where is the time derivative of the inertia tensor contracted with the angular velocity ) vanishes because the integral it contains is the first moment of mass, and the problem specifies that the rigid body is rotating about its center of mass.
Here is the breakdown of the vanishing term and the physical reason:
From Step 3 of the proof on the web page, the third term in the expanded expression for is:
This term is manipulated to separate the angular velocity and position components:
The integral part of this term is:
is the mass density.
is the infinitesimal volume element.
is the -th component of the position vector .
This integral, , represents the first moment of mass (or static moment) of the body.
The integral is related to the center of mass () by the definition:
where is the total mass of the rigid body.
The proof explicitly states that the rotation is about the center of mass (CM). If the origin of the coordinate system is chosen to be the center of mass, then the position vector of the center of mass is .
Therefore, since the rotation is about the center of mass:
Which means:
Because this integral is zero, the entire third term vanishes, significantly simplifying the expression for .
Brief audio
Proof and Derivation related to FAQ
Last updated
Was this helpful?
